<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: John Gray, Straw Dogs: Thoughts on Humans and Other Animals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://anatomylesson.wordpress.com/2008/04/07/john-gray-straw-dogs-thoughts-on-humans-and-other-animals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://anatomylesson.wordpress.com/2008/04/07/john-gray-straw-dogs-thoughts-on-humans-and-other-animals/</link>
	<description>Dissecting non-corporeal object-beings poorly over airwave and interwave</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:23:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: caindevera</title>
		<link>http://anatomylesson.wordpress.com/2008/04/07/john-gray-straw-dogs-thoughts-on-humans-and-other-animals/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>caindevera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 21:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anatomylesson.wordpress.com/?p=66#comment-42</guid>
		<description>Thanks Cavernously.  Sorry for the late delay in responding; long hours and such.  It was really hard cutting through John Gray&#039;s arguments: he makes them well, and some of his points are very thoughtful, but I ultimately think he makes the kind of sweeping generalisations and glib dismissals, with little evidence and poor sources, more typical of pundits then anything else; a shame, because he is a genuinely provoking intellectual figure, and someone who might at least make philosophy &#039;cool&#039; again, like it was back in the big bad Hegel days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Cavernously.  Sorry for the late delay in responding; long hours and such.  It was really hard cutting through John Gray&#8217;s arguments: he makes them well, and some of his points are very thoughtful, but I ultimately think he makes the kind of sweeping generalisations and glib dismissals, with little evidence and poor sources, more typical of pundits then anything else; a shame, because he is a genuinely provoking intellectual figure, and someone who might at least make philosophy &#8216;cool&#8217; again, like it was back in the big bad Hegel days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cavernously</title>
		<link>http://anatomylesson.wordpress.com/2008/04/07/john-gray-straw-dogs-thoughts-on-humans-and-other-animals/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>cavernously</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 14:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anatomylesson.wordpress.com/?p=66#comment-39</guid>
		<description>Cavernously says : I absolutely agree with this !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cavernously says : I absolutely agree with this !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: caindevera</title>
		<link>http://anatomylesson.wordpress.com/2008/04/07/john-gray-straw-dogs-thoughts-on-humans-and-other-animals/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>caindevera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 03:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anatomylesson.wordpress.com/?p=66#comment-30</guid>
		<description>Thanks Geoff, I appreciate that.  I must admit, in my defence, I published this late on Sunday night to use as a radio show guide; I was meaning to revise it Monday after work, but I&#039;ve been too ill for the last few days to do so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Geoff, I appreciate that.  I must admit, in my defence, I published this late on Sunday night to use as a radio show guide; I was meaning to revise it Monday after work, but I&#8217;ve been too ill for the last few days to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff</title>
		<link>http://anatomylesson.wordpress.com/2008/04/07/john-gray-straw-dogs-thoughts-on-humans-and-other-animals/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 00:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anatomylesson.wordpress.com/?p=66#comment-29</guid>
		<description>s/but that is/but I doubt that is/


I rely too much on comment previews for proofreading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>s/but that is/but I doubt that is/</p>
<p>I rely too much on comment previews for proofreading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff</title>
		<link>http://anatomylesson.wordpress.com/2008/04/07/john-gray-straw-dogs-thoughts-on-humans-and-other-animals/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 00:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anatomylesson.wordpress.com/?p=66#comment-28</guid>
		<description>A minor point having little to do with the main thrust of the criticism of a book which I, admittedly,  have not read:


You twice use the term &quot;hunter gathers&quot;. Isn&#039;t it &quot;hunter gatherers&quot;?  The former is, of course, a character on &lt;em&gt;The Venture Brothers&lt;/em&gt;, but that is what you were referring to.

Then again, a quick google search reveals plenty of non-Venture results for both. I am confused!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A minor point having little to do with the main thrust of the criticism of a book which I, admittedly,  have not read:</p>
<p>You twice use the term &#8220;hunter gathers&#8221;. Isn&#8217;t it &#8220;hunter gatherers&#8221;?  The former is, of course, a character on <em>The Venture Brothers</em>, but that is what you were referring to.</p>
<p>Then again, a quick google search reveals plenty of non-Venture results for both. I am confused!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
